X-Git-Url: http://git.grml.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=faq%2Findex.html.tt2;h=3fbe85e94d027569cb95770cf91ef8f5a6875cd7;hb=e215725a6170731a9508f92e654794a1892b8fba;hp=b602dcb2c850318d81cb46adbaa630d7c5a2ecad;hpb=01cfd24cd83754944282e83cec9e7cfd6e96f079;p=grml.org.git diff --git a/faq/index.html.tt2 b/faq/index.html.tt2 index b602dcb..3fbe85e 100644 --- a/faq/index.html.tt2 +++ b/faq/index.html.tt2 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@

FAQ for grml

-

Up2date: applies to Grml releases version 2011.12

+

Up2date: applies to Grml version 2017.05

Index:

@@ -36,11 +36,13 @@
  1. What is Grml?
  2. What are grml32 / grml64 and grml96?
  3. +
  4. What is the difference between grml-full and grml-small?
  5. Where do I get Grml?
  6. What does Grml mean?
  7. What about the release name?
  8. Requirements for running Grml
  9. Which bootoptions does Grml support?
  10. +
  11. Why is Grml using systemd?
  12. Are there any known issues with this release? How about reporting bugs?
@@ -76,28 +78,35 @@

What is Grml?

-

Grml is a bootable CD (Live-CD) based +

Grml is a bootable live system (Live-CD) based on Debian. It is not necessary to install anything to a harddisk. Grml includes a collection of GNU/Linux software especially for system administrators. It specializes on administrative tasks like installation, deployment and system rescue.

-

What are grml32 / grml64 and grml96?

+

What are grml32 / grml64 and grml96?

-

Unless you've a good reason to really choose the 32bit flavour we - strongly encourage you to use either the grml64 or the grml96 - flavour.

+

Unless you've a good reason to really choose the 32bit flavour we + strongly encourage you to use either the grml64 or the grml96 + flavour.

-

Please notice that this schema was introduced starting with the - downsized Grml release 2011.12. Until then grml96 didn't exist and - grml32 was known as just 'grml'.

+

Please notice that this schema was introduced starting with the + downsized Grml release 2011.12. Until then grml96 didn't exist and + grml32 was known as just 'grml'.

+ +

What is the difference between grml-full and grml-small?

+ +

grml-small provides a reduced set of available software compared to + grml-full. It provides the same Linux kernel image as grml-full and is + fully binary compatible. Choose the grml-small flavour if size - for + whatever reason - really matters to you.

Where do I get Grml?

@@ -112,10 +121,7 @@

What about the release name?

-

Codename of Grml 2011.12 is "Knecht Rootrecht". It's a wordplay on - Knecht - Ruprecht, which translates as Farmhand Ruprecht or Servant - Ruprecht.

+

Codename of Grml 2014.11 is "Gschistigschasti", which is colloquial for 'fuss' in Austria.

Requirements for running Grml

@@ -134,8 +140,8 @@

What does accessibility at Grml mean?

-

The Grml kernel includes support for speakup. For software, - brltty and espeakup are included.

+

The Grml kernel includes support for speakup. For software, + brltty and espeakup are included.

Which bootoptions does Grml support?

@@ -146,6 +152,60 @@ href="http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt">kernel-parameters.txt of the Linux kernel applies to Grml as well.

+

Why is Grml using systemd?

+ +

The switch from file-rc to systemd happened for various reasons. + Grml used file-rc for many years, mainly because it provided a better + way to control startup behavior via its /etc/runlevel.conf configuration + than with using sysvinit. Though for us Grml developers this also meant + that whenever there have been any changes in Debian's startup + configuration we had to compare our /etc/runlevel.conf setup with what a + normal Debian system would give us. Users who wanted to remaster Grml + with a custom startup procedure as well had to practically fork + maintenance of the /etc/runlevel.conf file. This didn't only mean + tracking new features/services, but also solve any possible issues + around it - duplicating efforts and wasting developers time + unnecessarily. Lately we also started to see problems that no one else + seemed to have (or care about enough), for example with multiple network + cards we ran into race-conditions with resolvconf. Problems like that + turned out to be release stoppers for us.

+ +

systemd on the other hand provides great documentation, service + supervision, takes care of parallel service startup and is the default + init system on most Linux distributions nowadays. This means more users, + better testing and integration. Logging, startup time investigation (to + get a fast boot procedure) and identifying failed service startups with + sysvinit/file-rc was always hard, unreliable or even impossible under + certain conditions. bootlogd was unreliable (while `journalctl -b` is + available out-of-the-box with systemd), bootchart not nicely integrated + (while systemd-analyze blame/critical-chain works out-of-the-box) and we + aren't aware of any equivalence for e.g. `systemctl --failed`.

+ +

While migrating our stack to systemd is not fully finished + yet, its switch - at least so far - was easier than expected. It also + turns out that it gives users who want to remaster Grml (or build their + very own ISOs from scratch using grml-live) more flexibility and control + over the startup process. systemd's override.conf mechanism and preset + feature provides the flexibility to overwrite unwanted behavior, without + losing the option to use existing defaults.

+ +

Last but not least we think it's good that systemd is actively + maintained and receives attention. The sysvinit/file-rc ecosystem was + stagnating/non-existend for too many years. Grml used its own initrd + implementation in its very beginnings, until a more broadly available + initramfs-tools/ live-boot solution appeared, broadening the user base, + sharing goals amongst different (live) distributions. Back in the days + Grml - like many other live distributions - had to implement hardware + recognition on its own. While udev received lots of complaints back + then, its integration actually solved all the hardware recognition for + the good. systemd's vision of stateless systems is something which helps + building live systems like Grml.

+ +

While we don't claim that systemd is perfect and doesn't have its + issues and drawbacks (like any software), we're happy about its + existence and more than happy about development and support by Debian's + systemd folks.

+

Are there any known issues? How about reporting bugs?

@@ -176,7 +236,7 @@ possible (unless you set a password or create new user accounts as root). You can create valid passwords using "sudo passwd [username]" from the shell individually. To set a password - for the Grml user and enable SSH login you can use the 'ssh' + for users 'root' and 'grml' and enable SSH login you can use the 'ssh' boot option, like 'ssh=yourpassword'.

How do I find out the version of Grml

@@ -211,8 +271,8 @@ grml keyboard=de xkeyboard=de lang=at # enter this at the bootprompt

Which window managers can I use?

-

Starting with the 2011.12 release Grml provides Fluxbox as window manager.

+

Starting with the 2011.12 release Grml provides Fluxbox as window manager.

Where are my LVM devices?

@@ -296,15 +356,15 @@ grml keyboard=de xkeyboard=de lang=at # enter this at the bootprompt

Short anwer: No.

-

If you want to get a plain Debian system take a look at grml-debootstrap.

+

If you want to get a plain Debian system take a look at grml-debootstrap.

-

Long(er) answer: yes it's possible to install Grml. But it's not - supported and you'll be on your own. That's why we decided to make it - not-so-obvious. If you really know what you're doing you'll find out on - your own. Reminder: use grml-debootstrap or Debian Installer instead.

+

Long(er) answer: yes it's possible to install Grml. But it's not + supported and you'll be on your own. That's why we decided to make it + not-so-obvious. If you really know what you're doing you'll find out on + your own. Reminder: use grml-debootstrap or Debian Installer instead.

Software

@@ -320,8 +380,8 @@ grml keyboard=de xkeyboard=de lang=at # enter this at the bootprompt

Short answer: because Zsh rocks, really!

-

Long(er) answer: If you don't know Zsh take a look the Grml Zsh reference card.

+

Long(er) answer: If you don't know Zsh take a look the Grml Zsh reference card.

If you are a Bash user and don't know Zsh yet, don't be afraid. Bash is largely a subset of Zsh and you don't have to